I just wrote such a good post and my computer ate it. So I’ll try to reproduce it. I called it “putting out fires” because one of my commenters said that the Open Theist god spends all his time putting out fires. It is Open Theism that got me started blogging in the first place, but after reading about it and discussing it for a while I realized that NO, I wasn’t an open theist because I believe in the infallibility of the Bible, I am not a relativist, and I do believe that Jesus is the only way to Heaven. Notice I didn’t say that Christianity was the only way…one of my blog mates has a quote on her site from Ghandi that goes something like this: I like your Christ, its you Christians I don’t understand.” In the movie about his life, Ghandi says, “If I had met even one person who lived the life of a Christian, as put forth in the words of Jesus, I would have become a Christian.” Pastor Art has been discussing the problem of contextualizing the gospel. I am reading the origin stories of 4 North American tribes with my 7th grade social studies class. Each story has a hint of the true story: a creator (the Hopi call him Father), first man and woman (none of them remember their names), a great flood and rainbow to name a few. If we take time to listen to the stories of the land and look into the hearts of the people, we can always find a starting point to begin telling them the rest of the story – the true story. But as far as not contextualizing the gospel – if that is the right thing to do, then we must go back to the context in which it was first told, before Luther, before Augustine, back to first century Christianity. I know we should trust the HOLY SPIRIT, that He can use any portion of any translation of the Scriptures to speak Truth into our lives. I also believe the Bible Translators who have worked so diligently to put the Scriptures into a language we could understand, were sincere in their efforts and deserve our respect. However, I have come to the conclusion, that all of our translations have been greatly influenced by the teachings of Luther, Calvin, and Augustine. Since it is common knowledge that these men (as well as the Roman Catholic translators) had strong anti-jew sentiments, identifying the elect mentioned in the Bible as Jews, would be unlikely. They would need another way to interpret those verses. And since Augustine’s doctrine of personal predestination was so influential in the early church, when the translators had a choice of words, one which supported personal predestination, and another equally viable word, which doesn’t support it – which one would they choose? Of course we don’t all need to be Greek and Hebrew scholars to understand the truths of the Bible, but we who are teachers should be able to search out the truth. Word studies usually show that there are many possibilities…the words chosen often reflect the bias or preconceived ideas of the translators. I do not believe in Divine Election, or Personal Predestination. I am not the only “Christian” in the world who denies that doctrine. If we follow that doctrine to its logical conclusion, than God is the author of lies, and the creator of sin. He is a puppet master and we are all behaving exactly as He willed it from before the beginning of time. That is not God, as He revealed Himself, in the written word or in the living WORD. God is Love. God is light and in Him there is no darkness at all. God is a covenant God. He guides, He instructs, He forgives, and He restores. This is not putting out fires, this is being a loving parent who has given His beloved creatures, made in His image, a free will, and a responsibility.
Do people seek God? In my “seek ye first” post I gave several verses that support the claim that we do, and indeed we should seek God. There are many more. When I get to the key board again, I will site some verses that show that God has given us a free will, and that He also has been know to “change His mind” because of the prayers of the faithful. I loved the illustration that Wanderer left on my Romans 1 post, the difference between a story writer and a story teller. There is a light shining in the darkness, the darkness does not comprehend it, but the darkness cannot put it out.